<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gmail needs an API</title>
	<atom:link href="http://labs.phurix.net/posts/gmail-needs-an-api/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://labs.phurix.net/posts/gmail-needs-an-api</link>
	<description>Research and development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 01:26:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top 10 host</title>
		<link>http://labs.phurix.net/posts/gmail-needs-an-api/comment-page-1#comment-192891</link>
		<dc:creator>Top 10 host</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hm2k.com/?p=570#comment-192891</guid>
		<description>great idea,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great idea,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hm2k</title>
		<link>http://labs.phurix.net/posts/gmail-needs-an-api/comment-page-1#comment-186941</link>
		<dc:creator>hm2k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 13:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hm2k.com/?p=570#comment-186941</guid>
		<description>That sounds similar to security through obscurity.

If spammers want to spam, they will do by any means, heck they already do and they don&#039;t need an API to do it, they make their own.

Further more Google is very good at handling spam, I&#039;m sure this wouldn&#039;t be a deal breaker.

You&#039;d have to signup before you could use the API anyway.

We can&#039;t let the fear of spam stop progress can we...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That sounds similar to security through obscurity.</p>
<p>If spammers want to spam, they will do by any means, heck they already do and they don&#8217;t need an API to do it, they make their own.</p>
<p>Further more Google is very good at handling spam, I&#8217;m sure this wouldn&#8217;t be a deal breaker.</p>
<p>You&#8217;d have to signup before you could use the API anyway.</p>
<p>We can&#8217;t let the fear of spam stop progress can we&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://labs.phurix.net/posts/gmail-needs-an-api/comment-page-1#comment-186813</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hm2k.com/?p=570#comment-186813</guid>
		<description>Its a great idea, but do you think this could open gmail up to becoming the spam capital of the interwebs?

It seems from looking how quickly it exploded on Twitter that an API that allows you to post is a spammer dream.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its a great idea, but do you think this could open gmail up to becoming the spam capital of the interwebs?</p>
<p>It seems from looking how quickly it exploded on Twitter that an API that allows you to post is a spammer dream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: labs.phurix.net @ 2012-02-07 05:54:50 -->
